Archive for the ‘EPA Air News’ Category

The Stationary Source Audit Sample (SASS) starts on 6/16/2013

Monday, April 29th, 2013

The information for obtaining SSAS audit samples is available on the EMC website www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/email.html#audit, therefore, the 60-day clock has started.  The EPA restructured program requires that two accredited providers be available, and available audit samples must be listed on the EMC website 60 days before audits are required. The two currently accredited providers are:

A list of methods for which audit samples are available is available on the TNI website here.

If you have questions, contact Candace Sorrell at EPA (Sorrell.Candace@epa.gov).

Clean Air Act Settlement with Wisconsin Utilities to Reduce Emissions

Monday, April 22nd, 2013

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Justice, and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Wisconsin announced a Clean Air Act (CAA) settlement with Wisconsin Power and Light Company (WPL) that will significantly reduce air pollution from three coal-fired power plants located near Portage, Sheboygan, and Cassville, Wis.

WPL operates the plants that are covered by the settlement, and the other defendants, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (WPSC), Madison Gas and Electric Company, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company, are co- and former owners of the units. WPL and its co-defendants agreed to invest more than $1 billion in pollution control technology, spend a total of $8.5 million on environmental mitigation projects, and pay a civil penalty of $2.45 million to resolve alleged violations of the CAA.

“EPA is committed to protecting communities by reducing air pollution from the largest sources of emissions,” said Cynthia Giles, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. “The pollution reductions and the significant investment in local environmental projects required under this agreement will ensure that the people of Wisconsin and neighboring states have cleaner, healthier air.”

“This settlement will improve air quality in Wisconsin and downwind areas by significantly reducing releases of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and other harmful pollutants,” said Ignacia S. Moreno, assistant attorney general for the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice. “This agreement also demonstrates the Justice Department’s commitment to enforcing the New Source Review provisions of the Clean Air Act, which help ensure clean air for those communities affected by large sources of air pollution.”

Under the settlement, the defendants must install new pollution control technology on the three largest units, continuously operate the new and existing pollution controls, and comply with stringent pollutant emission rates and annual tonnage limitations. The settlement also requires WPL and WPSC to permanently retire, refuel, or repower four additional coal-fired units at the Edgewater and Nelson Dewey plants. The actions taken to comply with this settlement will result in annual reductions of sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and particulate matter (PM) of approximately 54,000 tons from 2011 levels. This settlement covers all seven coal-fired boilers at the Columbia, Edgewater, and Nelson Dewey power plants.

The settlement also requires the defendants to spend $8.5 million on projects that will benefit the environment and human health in communities located near the facilities, including $260,500 to the U.S. Forest Service and $260,500 to the National Park Service, to be used on projects to address the damage done from the emissions. The remaining $7.479 million will be spent on a combination projects, including up to $2.1 million on land acquisition and restoration; up to $5,000,000 on a long term major solar photovoltaic (PV) power purchase agreement or a solar PV panels installation project; and up to $2 million on renewable energy resource enhancements for existing wind farms and hydroelectric facilities.

Reducing air pollution from the largest sources of emissions, including coal-fired power plants, is one of EPA’s National Enforcement Initiatives for 2011-2013. SO2 and NOx, two key pollutants emitted from power plants, have numerous adverse effects on human health and are significant contributors to acid rain, smog, and haze. These pollutants are converted in the air to fine particles of particulate matter that can cause severe respiratory and cardiovascular impacts, and premature death. Reducing these harmful air pollutants will benefit the communities located near the facilities, particularly communities disproportionately impacted by environmental risks and vulnerable populations, including children. Because air pollution from power plants can travel significant distances downwind, this settlement will also reduce air pollution outside the immediate region.

This is the 26th judicial settlement secured by the Justice Department and EPA as part of a national enforcement initiative to control harmful emissions from power plants under the CAA’s New Source Review requirements. The total combined sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emission reductions secured from these settlements will exceed 2 million tons each year once all the required pollution controls have been installed and implemented.

Sierra Club is co-plaintiff to the settlement.

The settlement was lodged with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, and is subject to a 30-day public comment period and final court approval.

More information about the settlement: http://www.epa.gov/enforcement/air/cases/wisconsinpower.html

More information about EPA’s enforcement initiative: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/data/planning/initiatives/2011airpollution.html


EPA Proposes to Reduce Power Plant Discharges into Waterways

Friday, April 19th, 2013

In accordance with a consent decree and in line with requirements under the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today will propose a range of options to help reduce dangerous pollutants, including mercury, arsenic, lead, and selenium that are released into America’s waterways by coal ash, air pollution control waste and other waste from steam electric power plants. Today’s proposal includes a variety of options for whether and how these different waste streams should be treated. EPA will take comment on all of these options, which it will use to help inform the most appropriate final standard.

EPA has put a focus on ensuring any final rule would protect public health while being sensible and achievable, and in line with that goal, under every preferred option proposed by EPA today, more than half of America’s coal fired power plants would be in compliance without incurring any additional cost.

The proposal updates standards that have been in place since 1982, incorporating technology improvements in the steam electric power industry over the last three decades as required by the Clean Water Act. The proposed national standards are based on data collected from industry and provide flexibility in implementation through a phased-in approach and use of technologies already installed at a number of plants. Under the proposed approach, new requirements for existing power plants would be phased in between 2017 and 2022, and would leverage flexibilities as necessary.

Fewer than half of coal-fired power plants are estimated to incur costs under any of the proposed preferred options, because many power plants already have the technology and procedures in place to meet the proposed pollution control standards.

The four preferred options differ in the number of waste streams covered (such as fly ash handling systems, treatment of air pollution control waste and bottom ash), the size of the units controlled and the stringency of the treatment controls to be imposed. EPA estimates that the regulations would reduce pollutant discharges by 470 million to 2.62 billion pounds annually and reduce water use by 50 billion to 103 billion gallons per year.

EPA also announced its intention to align this Clean Water Act rule with a related rule for coal combustion residuals (CCRs, also known as “coal ash”) proposed in 2010 under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The two rules would apply to many of the same facilities and would work together to reduce pollution associated with coal ash and related wastes. EPA is seeking comment from industry and other stakeholders to ensure that both final rules are aligned to reduce pollution efficiently and minimize regulatory burdens.

There are approximately 1,200 steam electric power plants that generate electricity using nuclear fuel or fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas in the U.S. Approximately 500 of these power plants are coal fired units which are the primary source of the pollutants being addressed by the proposed regulation. Power plants that are smaller than 50 megawatts would not be impacted by these new standards, and the majority of coal-fired power plants would incur no costs under the proposed standards.

The public comment period on the proposed rule will be open for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. The agency is under a consent decree to take final action by May 22, 2014.

More information: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/steam-electric/index.cfm



EPA’s Privatized Stationary Source Audit Program (SSAP) starts June 16, 2013

Tuesday, April 16th, 2013

On September 13, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the final rule to restructure the stationary source audit program. This program provides criteria to assure that the analyst and the field testing personnel are sufficiently capable of conducting emissions testing for compliance with the Clean Air Act requirements. Audit samples must be analyzed along with the samples collected while testing for regulatory compliance. This analysis helps the regulatory agency determine the validity of compliance test results. The changes finalized in this rule allow accredited providers to supply the audit samples and require sources to obtain and use audit samples obtained from the accredited providers instead of EPA, as was the former practice. In addition, this action moves the requirements for audits from EPA’s rules laying out individual emissions test methodologies to generalized requirements in the general provisions of the Clean Air Act. To review the final rulemaking, click here. To review the Summary of Comments and Responses, click here. To see Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for this rule, click here. NOTE: Method 3A was inadvertently left out of the list of instrumental methods which are not required to have audit samples in the revisions to the General Provisions of Parts 51, 60, 61 and 63. This error will be corrected in the EPA’s next corrections package.

The second accredited audit provider has been entered into the Stationary Source Audit Program.  Therefore, the program takes effect 60 days from today.  Here is more information about the program including a list of test methods that will require audit samples as of June 16, 2013:

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/email.html#audit

EPA proposes to delete Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) area designations for Air Quality Planning Purposes in Nevada

Tuesday, April 16th, 2013

EPA is proposing to delete certain area designations for total suspended particulate within the State of Nevada because the designations are no longer necessary. These designations relate to the attainment or unclassifiable areas for total suspended particulate in Clark County as well as the following nonattainment areas for total suspended particulate elsewhere within the State of Nevada: Carson Desert, Winnemucca Segment, Lower Reese Valley, FernleyArea, Mason Valley, and Clovers Area.

EPA is proposing this action under the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 16, 2013.

Mineral Wool/Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing NESHAP Rule Proposed

Monday, April 15th, 2013

This action proposes chromium and particulate matter (for metals) standards for wool fiberglass gas-fired glass-melting furnaces at area sources and adds these sources to the category list in the Urban Air Toxics Strategy. It also proposes amendments to the existing major source rules for Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass, supplementing the rule proposed on November 25, 2011. The proposed area source standards for the gas-fired glass-melting furnaces used to make wool fiberglass would increase the level of environmental protection.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 30, 2013. If anyone contacts the EPA requesting a public hearing by April 22, 2013, we will hold a public hearing on May 6, 2013. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on the information collection provisions are best assured of having full effect if the Office of Management and Budget receives a copy of your comments on or before May 15, 2013.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-04-15/html/2013-07257.htm

CountryMark Refining and Logistics, LLC to Install $18 Million in Pollution Controls to Resolve Clean Air Act Violations at Indiana Refinery

Thursday, February 28th, 2013

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice announced that Countrymark Refining and Logistics, LLC has agreed to pay a $167,000 civil penalty, perform environmental projects totaling more than $180,000, and spend $18 million on new pollution controls to resolve Clean Air Act (CAA) violations at its refinery, located in Mount Vernon, Ind.

Once fully implemented, the pollution controls required by the settlement will reduce emissions of harmful air pollution that can cause respiratory problems, such as asthma, and are significant contributors to acid rain, smog, and haze, by an estimated 1,000 tons or more per year.

“Under the settlement, CountryMark will implement new practices and install innovative, cutting-edge pollution controls at its Indiana refinery,” said Cynthia Giles, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. “These innovative controls include ensuring that pollution control devices, such as flares, are operated properly to minimize pollution emitted into the air and to improve their overall efficiency.”

“This settlement requires CountryMark to install new controls and implement new practices at its refinery to reduce air pollution from all significant sources at the refinery,” said Ignacia S. Moreno, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. “Notably, CountryMark will be the third refiner to put in place new measures to substantially reduce gas emissions from its flare, and the company’s commitment to retrofit diesel school buses will also reduce air emissions that affect the area’s residents.”

The complaint alleges that the company made modifications to its refinery that increased emissions without first obtaining pre-construction permits and installing required pollution control equipment. The CAA requires major sources of air pollution to obtain such permits before making changes that would result in a significant net emissions increase of any pollutant. The complaint also alleges CAA violations related to flare operation, the New Source Performance Standards, and applicable requirements for leak detection and repair (LDAR).

The settlement requires new and upgraded pollution controls, more stringent emission limits, and aggressive LDAR practices to reduce emissions from refinery equipment and processing units. The settlement also requires new controls on the refinery’s flaring devices, which are used to burn-off waste gases. The amount of pollution that flares emit depends on the total amount of waste gases sent to a flare and the efficiency at which the flare is operated when burning those gases. The settlement will ensure proper combustion efficiency for any gases that are sent to a flare and will also cap the total amount of waste gases that can be sent to a flare at the refinery. The flares requirements are part of EPA’s national effort to reduce emissions from flares at refineries, petrochemical, and chemical plants.

The flaring efficiency requirements are settlement with CountryMark are part of EPA’s national enforcement initiative to improve compliance among petroleum refiners and to reduce significant amounts of air pollution from refineries nationwide through comprehensive, company-wide enforcement settlements. The settlement with CountryMark is the 32nd under the EPA initiative. With today’s settlement, 109 refineries operating in 32 states and territories – more than 90 percent of the total refining capacity in the United States – are under judicially enforceable agreements to significantly reduce emissions of pollutants. As a result of the settlement agreements, refiners have agreed to invest more than $6 billion in new pollution controls designed to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and other pollutants by over 360,000 tons per year.

The State of Indiana actively participated in the settlement with CountryMark and has received over $110,000 to fund a supplemental environmental project to remove asbestos-containing material from an old grain elevator in downtown Mount Vernon. The settlement also requires CountryMark to provide at least $70,000 in funding for a supplemental environmental project that will install diesel retrofit and/or idle reduction technologies on school buses and/or non-school bus, publicly-owned vehicles located within 50 miles of the refinery.

The consent decree, lodged in the Southern District of Indiana, is subject to a 30-day public comment period and court approval.

More information about the settlement:
http://www.epa.gov/enforcement/air/cases/countrymarkrefiningandlogisticsllc.html

More information about EPA’s Air Toxics National Enforcement Initiative:
http://www.epa.gov/compliance/data/planning/initiatives/2011airtoxics.html

Enforcement Alert: EPA Enforcement Targets Flaring Efficiency Violations (August 2012):
http://www.epa.gov/enforcement/air/documents/newsletters/flaringviolations.pdf

More information about EPA’s Petroleum Refinery Initiative:
http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/caa/oil/index.html

Interim Determination to Stay and Defer Sanctions for the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Thursday, February 14th, 2013

EPA is proposing to fully approve two permitting rules submitted by California as a revision to the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD or District) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These rules were adopted by the SMAQMD to regulate the construction and modification of stationary sources of air pollution within Sacramento County. EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision based on the Agency’s conclusion that the rules are consistent with applicable Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements, policies and guidance. Final approval of these rules would make the rules federally enforceable and correct program deficiencies identified in a previous EPA rulemaking on July 20, 2011.  SMAQMD’s Proposed Rule Revions are to Rule 214 & 217.

More detailed  information below.

Air Quality Implementation Plans; Revisions:  California; Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits, 10589-10591

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-14/html/2013-03249.htm

Interim Final Determination to Stay and Defer Sanctions: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, 10554-10556

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-14/html/2013-03250.htm

EPA published CISWI and NHSM Rules and updated Area Boiler Rule on 2/7/13

Monday, February 11th, 2013

1) The CISWI/NHSM final rule (78 FR 9112) is published today, February 7, 2013, in the Federal Register.

CISWI = Commercial Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators = Incinerators and Boilers (or cement kilns) that burn any waste (where waste is defined by the NHSM rule)
NHSM = Non Hazardous Secondary Materials = Defines what is a waste, when that material is combusted or used as an ingredient (like in a cement kiln)

The effective date of the CISWI rule is August 7, 2013

New CISWIs (those constructed after June 4, 2010 or modified/reconstructed after Aug 7, 2013) must be in compliance within 6 months after the date of publication (Aug 7, 2013) of the final reconsideration rule or at startup, whichever is later.

The compliance date for existing CISWI sources subject to standards in this final rule is 5 years after the date of publication (February 7, 2018) of this final rule or 3 years after the state plan is approved, whichever happens earlier.

This action sets forth the EPA’s final decision on the issues for which it granted reconsideration in December 2011, which pertain to certain aspects of the March 21, 2011, final rule titled “Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units” (CISWI rule). This action also includes our final decision to deny the requests for reconsideration with respect to all issues raised in the petitions for reconsideration of the final commercial and industrial solid waste incineration rule for which we did not grant reconsideration. Among other things, this final action establishes effective dates for the standards and makes technical corrections to the final rule to clarify definitions, references, applicability and compliance issues. In addition, the EPA is issuing final amendments to the regulations that were codified by the Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials rule (NHSM rule). Originally promulgated on March 21, 2011, the non-hazardous secondary materials rule provides the standards and procedures for identifying whether non-hazardous secondary materials are solid waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act when used as fuels or ingredients in combustion units. The purpose of these amendments is to clarify several provisions in order to implement the non-hazardous secondary materials rule as the agency originally intended.

Full information can be found at these links:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-07/html/2012-31632.htm
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-07/pdf/2012-31632.pdf

2) EPA’s Area Source Boiler Website (www.epa.gov/boilercompliance) has been updated to add highlights of the important changes, a revised example initial notification, and some information about electronic reporting.

ICI – Boiler MACT released in Federal Register

Friday, February 1st, 2013

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources:
Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers, 7488-7522

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-01/pdf/2012-31645.pdf
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-01/html/2012-31645.htm