Posts Tagged ‘Boiler MACT’

BOILER MACT Adjustments from 12/2011 reconsideration proposal

Wednesday, December 26th, 2012

EPA’s Air Rules for Major and Area Source Boilers and Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators
_______________________________________________________________________________________
This fact sheet summarizes the key comments received and the adjustments from the December 2011 proposal.

COMMENTS SUBMITTED ON PROPOSALS
Substantive comments were received on the proposals, including new data. Comments focused on a number of key topics.

• Boiler Major Source Rule:
o Achievability of carbon monoxide (CO) limits
o Justification for a solid fuel subcategory for mercury and hydrogen chloride (HCl)
o Establishment of a single PM emission limit for the solid fossil fuel subcategory
o Ability of certain gases to qualify as Gas 1 fuel (i.e., as clean as natural gas)
o Extending the compliance date
o Allowing averaging between subcategories for units that use natural gas

• Boiler Area Source Rule:
o Extension of the initial compliance date for existing boilers subject to tune-up requirements
o Reduced frequency of tune-ups for certain boilers
o Applicability based on definitions of “seasonal boiler,” “temporary boiler,” and “residential boiler”

• CISWI Rule:
o Further subcategorization of the solid-fuel Energy Recovery Unit (ERU) subcategory
o Proposed definition of “homogeneous waste”
o Definition of “contained gaseous material”
o Use of uncorrected CO Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) data during periods of startup and shutdown

• NHSM Rule:
o Revised definitions of “clean cellulosic biomass,” “contaminants,” and “established tire collection program”
o Concepts of “grouping” of contaminants and “design to burn” within the contaminant legitimacy 2 criterion
o Expansion of categorical list of non-waste fuels

KEY ADJUSTMENTS FROM RECONSIDERATION PROPOSAL TO FINAL

Based on additional data received, EPA made adjustments to several emission limits for major source boilers and CISWI units. Other changes are mainly editorial, to clarify applicability and implementation issues raised by the commenters.

• Boiler Major Source Rule
o Adding a separate subcategory for fluidized bed units with fluidized bed heat exchangers designed to burn coal
o Adjusting the definition of the limited use subcategory, allowing more flexibility on unit operations without increasing emissions or harm to human health and the environment.
o Adding performance test procedures for conducting performance stack test for demonstrating compliance with the alternate TSM emission limits.
o Establishing one single PM limit for all coal/solid fossil fuel subcategories.
o Allowing alternative total TSM emission limits for three liquid fuel subcategories, increasing the flexibility of the final rule.
o Adjusting some emission limits due to new data, corrections to old data and inventory changes.
o Reducing frequency of required tune-ups for some units, including units with continuous oxygen and CO trim systems.
o Revising definitions, including those for “30-day rolling average” and “daily block average,” “energy assessment” and “qualified energy assessor,” and “startup” and “shutdown.”
o Revising the sampling frequency for gaseous fuel-fired units that elected to demonstrate that the unit meets the specification for mercury for the unit designed to burn gas 1 subcategory.
o Extending the compliance time for demonstrating compliance with the numeric emission limits and energy assessment requirement to three years from the effective date of the amended rule, to provide facilities sufficient time to install controls or to make other compliance-related decisions. Existing boilers may request an additional year beyond that if technology cannot be installed in time.

• Boiler Area Source Rule
o Extending the initial compliance date for existing boilers subject to tune-up requirements to March
21, 2014.
o Revising the deadline for initial notification for existing boilers to no later than January 20, 2014.
o Dual-fuel fired boilers: revising provisions for existing dual-fuel fired units that fuel switch from gas
to coal, biomass or oil such that they would still be considered existing sources.
o Temporary boilers: amending the definition to allow petitioning for an extension beyond 12 months
for qualifying as a temporary boiler.
o Seasonal boilers: revising the definition of seasonal boiler to allow for 15 days of use during the
shutdown period for periodic testing and to clarify that the shutdown must be for a period of at
least 7 consecutive months each 12-month period.
o Limited-use boilers: adding a subcategory for boilers that have a federally enforceable average
annual capacity factor of no more than 10 percent and requiring these units to conduct tune-ups
every five years.
o Reducing frequency of tune-ups for boilers with an oxygen trim system that maintain an optimum
air-to-fuel ratio.
o Changing the energy assessment provisions and related definitions to better define the scope of the
assessment and allow for more streamlined assessments, including allowing sources already
operating under certain energy management programs to satisfy the assessment requirement.
o Revising PM emission limit requirements such that combustion of oil meeting certain sulfur content requirements by new oil-fired boilers is considered an alternative method of meeting the PM emission standard and that such units are not required to meet the PM emission limit.
o Reducing the fuel sampling and performance testing requirements such that after demonstration of initial compliance, under certain circumstances, further fuel sampling for boilers subject to a Hg emission limit and further PM performance testing for boilers subject to a PM emission limit is not required.

o Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) Rule
o Revising emission limits, include small remote incinerators (SRI), incinerators, energy recovery units (ERU) and waste burning kilns subcategories resulting from additional data, updated unit inventories, and methodology adjustments.
o Establishing separate emission standards for all nine pollutants from coal and biomass energy recovery units (ERUs).
o Expanding authorization to use uncorrected continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) data during periods of startup and shutdown to all pollutants for which a source demonstrates compliance with CEMS.
o Clarifying the methodology for establishing and monitoring oxygen levels.
o Removing the definition of homogeneous waste and retaining the requirement that certain facilities that combust solid waste obtain a determination from the EPA that such waste is homogenous.
o Requiring continuous parameter monitoring systems, instead of PM CEMS, for waste-burning kilns and large ERUs.
o Extending the effective dates for all CISWI, including small remote incinerators, to provide facilities sufficient time to install controls or to make other compliance-related decisions. Existing units will need to comply no later than three years after EPA approves a state plan or five years after the publication date of these final changes, whichever is earlier.
o Correcting the definition of waste-burning kiln and clarifying that the threshold for determining if a unit is subject to the CISWI rule is whether it “combusts” solid waste material.

o NHSM Rule
o Revising contaminant legitimacy criterion for NHSMs used as fuels, to make clear flexibility in how contaminant comparisons between NHSMs and traditional fuels may be made.
o Adding “dewatered pulp and paper sludges burned on-site at facilities that use a significant portion of materials as fuels where such dewatered sludges are managed in a manner that preserves the meaningful heating value of the materials” to the list of categorical non-waste fuels.
o Adding “coal refuse that has been recovered from legacy piles and processed in the same manner as currently-generated coal refuse” to the list of categorical non-waste fuels.
o Finalizing new rulemaking petition process for other categorical non-waste determinations.
o Streamlining existing petition process for NHSMs transferred off-site.

EPA Finalizes Clean Air Standards for Industrial Boilers, Incinerators and Cement Kilns

Friday, December 21st, 2012

On December 20th, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized changes to Clean Air Act standards for boilers and certain incinerators that will achieve extensive public health protections by slashing toxic air pollution, including mercury and particle pollution, while at the same addressing feedback provided by industry and labor groups, increasing the rule’s flexibility and dramatically reducing costs. As a result, 99 percent of the approximately 1.5 million boilers in the U.S. are not covered or can meet the new standards by conducting periodic maintenance or regular tune-ups.

The final adjustments to the standards are based on an extensive analysis of data and input from states, environmental groups, industry, lawmakers and the public. As a result of information gathered through this review, including significant dialogue and meetings with public health groups, industry, and the public, the final rule dramatically cuts the cost of implementation by individual boilers that EPA proposed in 2010. At the same time, these rules will continue to deliver significant public health benefits. EPA estimates that for every dollar spent to reduce these pollutants, the public will see $13 to $29 in health benefits, including fewer instances of asthma, heart attacks, as well as premature deaths.

Today’s rules set numerical emission limits for less than one percent of boilers – those that emit the majority of pollution from this sector. For these high emitting boilers and incinerators, typically operating at refineries, chemical plants and other industrial facilities, EPA is establishing more targeted emissions limits that protect public health and provide industry with practical, cost-effective options to meet the standards.

EPA has also finalized revisions to the Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rule to provide clarity on what types of secondary materials are considered non-waste fuels and provide greater flexibility in rule implementation. This final rule classifies a number of secondary materials as categorical non-wastes when used as a fuel and allows for operators to request that EPA identify specific materials through rulemaking as a categorical non-waste fuel.

Particle pollution and other harmful pollutants released by boilers and incinerators can lead to adverse health effects including cancer, heart disease, aggravated asthma and premature death. In addition, toxic pollutants such as mercury and lead that will be reduced by this rule are linked to developmental disabilities in children. These standards will avoid up to 8,100 premature deaths, prevent 5,100 heart attacks and avert 52,000 asthma attacks per year in 2015.

In a separate EPA action today, to meet a court deadline, the agency issued final amendments to the 2010 clean air standards for the cement manufacturing industry. The final amendments maintain the significant emission reductions from the 2010 standards, while providing industry additional time to implement the revised rules.

More CEMENT information: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/cement

More BOILER/INCEINERATOR information: www.epa.gov/airquality/combustion

Boiler Area Source MACT Rule not stayed (CIBO commentary)

Tuesday, May 15th, 2012

An excerpt from Council of Industrial Boiler Owners (CIBO) newsletter dated May 10th, 2012:

The Stay – We were very disappointed in the Administration’s decision not to issue a Stay of the Area Source MACT Rule. Any Area Source boiler that has not had their boiler tuned is currently in violation of the law.

While EPA says it will turn their head until the new rule is issued, that does not preclude any environmental group from acting if the opportunity presents itself, or if they don’t particularly like something you are or are not doing. Only a Stay would provide that Safe Harbor.

Reconsidered Boiler MACT Expected Out Soon

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

The EPA issued a Delay Notice in May 2011 to suspend the effective dates for Boiler MACT and CISWI.

An amended set of Boiler MACT and CISWI rules were re-proposed in December 2011 and was opened up for comment with the intent of being finalized in April 2012. Shortly after releasing these amended rulings, a court order vacated the Delay Notice, causing the March 2011 rulings to be put into effect.

The EPA then issued a “no action” letter that asserted its “enforcement discretion” to not hold industrial boiler operators to the March 2011 rules.

The EPA continues to review industry comments and available data to revise the rulings for a “final” time. The “final-final” rulings (reconsidered MACT) are expected in April 2012.

Revised Boiler MACT and Incinerator MACT rules out for public comment (Major source, Area source, CISWI)

Friday, December 2nd, 2011

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing changes to Clean Air Act standards for boilers and certain incinerators based on extensive analysis, review and consideration of data and input from states, environmental groups, industry, lawmakers and the public. The proposed reconsideration would achieve extensive public health protections through significant reductions in toxic air pollutants, including mercury and soot, while increasing the rule’s flexibility and addressing compliance concerns raised by industry and labor groups. The changes also cut the cost of implementation by nearly 50 percent from the original 2010 proposed rule while maintaining health benefits. These standards meet important requirements laid out in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.

“With this action, EPA is applying the right standards to the right boilers,” said Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation. “Gathering the latest and best real-world information is leading to practical, affordable air pollution safeguards that will provide the vital and overdue health protection that Americans deserve.”

More than 99 percent of boilers in the country are either clean enough that they are not covered by these standards or will only need to conduct maintenance and tune-ups to comply. Today’s proposals focus on the less than one percent of boilers that emit the majority of pollution from this sector. For these high emitting boilers, typically operating at refineries, chemical plants and other industrial facilities, EPA is proposing more targeted emissions limits that protect Americans’ health and provide industry with practical, cost-effective options to meet the standards – informed by data from these stakeholders. These limits are based on currently available technologies that are in use by sources across the country.

As a result of further information gathered through the reconsideration process, including significant dialog and meetings with stakeholders, the proposal maintains the dramatic cuts in the cost of implementation that were achieved in the final rules issued in March while continuing to deliver significant public health benefits. As a result, EPA estimates that for every dollar spent to cut these pollutants, the public will see $12 to $30 in health benefits, including fewer premature deaths.

Using a wide variety of fuels, including coal, natural gas, oil and biomass, boilers are used to power heavy machinery, provide heat for industrial and manufacturing processes in addition to a number of other uses, or heat large buildings. EPA’s proposal recognizes the diverse and complex range of uses and fuels and tailors standards to reflect the real-world operating conditions of specific types of boilers.

Some of the key changes EPA is proposing include:

Boilers at large sources of air toxics emissions: The major source proposal covers approximately 14,000 boilers – less than one percent of all boilers in the United States – located at large sources of air pollutants, including refineries, chemical plants, and other industrial facilities. EPA is proposing to create additional subcategories and revise emissions limits. EPA is also proposing to provide more flexible compliance options for meeting the particle pollution and carbon monoxide limits, replace numeric emissions limits with work practice standards for certain pollutants, allow more flexibility for units burning clean gases to qualify for work practice standards and reduce some monitoring requirements. EPA estimates that the cost of implementing these standards remains about $1.5 billion less than the April 2010 proposed standards. Health benefits to children and the public associated with reduced exposure to fine particles and ozone from these large source boilers have increased by almost 25 percent and are estimated to be $27 billion to $67 billion in 2015.

Boilers located at small sources of air toxics emissions: The proposal also covers about 187,000 boilers located at small sources of air pollutants, including commercial buildings, universities, hospitals and hotels. However, due to how little these boilers emit, 98 percent of area source boilers would simply be required to perform maintenance and routine tune-ups to comply with these standards. Only 2 percent of area source boilers may need to take additional steps to comply with the rule. To increase flexibility for most of these sources, EPA is proposing to require initial compliance tune-ups after two years instead after the first year.

Solid waste incinerators and revisions to the list of non-hazardous secondary materials: There are 95 solid waste incinerators that burn waste at a commercial or an industrial facility, including cement manufacturing facilities. EPA is proposing to adjust emissions limits for waste-burning cement kilns and for energy recovery units.

EPA is also proposing revisions to its final rule which identified the types of non-hazardous secondary materials that can be burned in boilers or solid waste incinerators. Following the release of that final rule, stakeholders expressed concerns regarding the regulatory criteria for a non-hazardous secondary material to be considered a legitimate, non-waste fuel, and how to demonstrate compliance with those criteria. To address these concerns, EPA’s proposed revisions provide clarity on what types of secondary materials are considered non-waste fuels, and greater flexibility. The proposed revisions also classify a number of secondary materials as non-wastes when used as a fuel and allow for a boiler or solid waste operator to request that EPA identify specific materials as a non-waste fuel.

Following the April 2010 proposals, the agency received more than 4,800 comments from businesses, communities and other key stakeholders. As part of the reconsideration process, EPA also received additional feedback after the agency issued the final standards in March 2011. EPA will accept public comment on these standards for 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. EPA intends to finalize the reconsideration by spring 2012.

More information: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/combustion

Boiler MACT schedule released by EPA

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said it will update proposed air toxics standards for boilers and certain solid waste incinerators by the end of October 2011 and issue final standards by the end of April 2012.

 EPA is also finalizing which non-hazardous secondary materials would be considered solid waste and which would be considered fuel, which would determine whether a material can be burned in a boiler or whether it must be burned in an incinerator.

Major Source Boiler MACT and CISWI MACT delayed

Wednesday, May 18th, 2011

The EPA is delaying the effective dates for the final rules titled “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters” and “Standards of Performance for New Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units” under the authority of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) until the proceedings for judicial review of these rules are completed or the EPA completes its reconsideration of the rules, whichever is earlier.

DATES: The effective dates of the final rules published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15608 and 76 FR 15704), are delayed until such time as judicial review is no longer pending or until the EPA completes its reconsideration of the rules, whichever is earlier.

The Director of the Federal Register has reviewed certain publications listed in these final rules for incorporation by reference approval. That approval is delayed until such time as the proceedings for judicial review of these rules are completed or the EPA completes its reconsideration of the rules, whichever is earlier. The EPA will publish in the Federal Register announcing the effective dates and the incorporation by reference approvals once delay is no longer necessary.

EPA delays Boiler MACT

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011
  • EPA is also issuing a stay to delay the effective date of the standards for major source boilers and commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators. The stay will allow the agency to seek additional public comment before requiring thousands of facilities across multiple, diverse industries to make investments that may not be reversible if the standards are revised following reconsideration and a full evaluation of all relevant data.
  • The stay will remain in place until the proceedings for judicial review of these rules are completed or EPA completes its reconsideration of the standards, whichever is earlier. EPA understands that members of the public may wish to submit additional data. Any additional data and information related to affected sources and their emissions should be submitted by e-mail to combustionsurvey@erg.com by July 15, 2011.

http://www.epa.gov/airquality/combustion/actions.html

EPA Announces Next Step on Air Toxics Standards for Boilers and Certain Incinerators (Boiler and CISWI MACT)

Monday, May 16th, 2011

  WASHINGTON – As previously announced, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking additional public feedback and gathering more information on the final standards for boilers and certain solid waste incinerators that were issued in February 2011. These additional opportunities for public input will ensure that any final standard will be informed by input and feedback from key stakeholders, including the public, industry, and public health communities.

Input through the public comment process already resulted in dramatic cuts in the cost of implementation, while maintaining maximum public health benefits, under the rule announced in February. As part of the reconsideration process, EPA will issue a stay postponing the effective date of the standards for major source boilers and commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators to allow the agency to continue to seek additional public comment before an updated rule is proposed. This process of careful consideration of public comments, and close attention to both costs and benefits, is consistent with the president’s directives with respect to regulation, as set out in executive order 13563, issued on January 18.

Following the April 2010 proposals, the agency received more than 4,800 comments from businesses and communities, including a significant amount of information that industry had not provided prior to the proposals. Based on this input, EPA made extensive revisions to the standards, and in December 2010 requested additional time for review to ensure the public’s input was fully addressed. The court only granted EPA 30 days, resulting in the February 2011 final rules. The agency is reconsidering the standards because the public did not have sufficient opportunity to comment on these changes, and, as a result, further public review and feedback is needed.    

EPA will accept additional data and information on these standards until July 15, 2011.

More information: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/combustion

The Avogadro Group, LLC adds a new Phoenix, Arizona office

Tuesday, May 10th, 2011

The Avogadro Group, LLC (Avogadro) announces our new Phoenix, Arizona office to serve Southern Nevada, Southern California, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Arizona.

The Phoenix office has the capability to handle preparation and deployment of a mobile laboratory for rapid deployment to job sites, as well as maintenance and calibration of all source testing equipment.

“Our office expansion is central to our long-term strategic objectives both in the state of California and nationally,” says Thomas W. Stucker, owner of Avogadro Group. “The team at our Phoenix office adds considerable depth to our source testing program.”

For more  information: http://tinyurl.com/3c9wemu