Posts Tagged ‘EPA’

EPA Proposes Revisions to Kraft Pulp Mills

Thursday, May 23rd, 2013

The EPA is proposing revisions to the new source performance standards (NSPS) for kraft pulp mills. These revised standards include particulate matter emission limits for recovery furnaces, smelt dissolving tanks and lime kilns, which apply to emission units commencing construction, reconstruction or modification after May 23, 2013 that are different than those required under the existing standards for kraft pulp mills. The exemptions to opacity standards do not apply to the proposed standards for kraft pulp mills. The proposed rule also removes the exemption for periods of startup and shutdown resulting in a standard that applies at all times. The proposed rule includes additional testing requirements and updated monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for affected sources. These differences are expected to ensure that control systems are properly maintained over time, ensure continuous compliance with standards and improve data accessibility for the EPA, states, tribal governments and communities.

Comments must be received on or before July 8, 2013. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on the information collection provisions are best assured of having full effect if the Office of Management and Budget receives a copy of your comments on or before June 24, 2013.

The Stationary Source Audit Sample (SASS) starts on 6/16/2013

Monday, April 29th, 2013

The information for obtaining SSAS audit samples is available on the EMC website www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/email.html#audit, therefore, the 60-day clock has started.  The EPA restructured program requires that two accredited providers be available, and available audit samples must be listed on the EMC website 60 days before audits are required. The two currently accredited providers are:

A list of methods for which audit samples are available is available on the TNI website here.

If you have questions, contact Candace Sorrell at EPA (Sorrell.Candace@epa.gov).

EPA Proposes to Reduce Power Plant Discharges into Waterways

Friday, April 19th, 2013

In accordance with a consent decree and in line with requirements under the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today will propose a range of options to help reduce dangerous pollutants, including mercury, arsenic, lead, and selenium that are released into America’s waterways by coal ash, air pollution control waste and other waste from steam electric power plants. Today’s proposal includes a variety of options for whether and how these different waste streams should be treated. EPA will take comment on all of these options, which it will use to help inform the most appropriate final standard.

EPA has put a focus on ensuring any final rule would protect public health while being sensible and achievable, and in line with that goal, under every preferred option proposed by EPA today, more than half of America’s coal fired power plants would be in compliance without incurring any additional cost.

The proposal updates standards that have been in place since 1982, incorporating technology improvements in the steam electric power industry over the last three decades as required by the Clean Water Act. The proposed national standards are based on data collected from industry and provide flexibility in implementation through a phased-in approach and use of technologies already installed at a number of plants. Under the proposed approach, new requirements for existing power plants would be phased in between 2017 and 2022, and would leverage flexibilities as necessary.

Fewer than half of coal-fired power plants are estimated to incur costs under any of the proposed preferred options, because many power plants already have the technology and procedures in place to meet the proposed pollution control standards.

The four preferred options differ in the number of waste streams covered (such as fly ash handling systems, treatment of air pollution control waste and bottom ash), the size of the units controlled and the stringency of the treatment controls to be imposed. EPA estimates that the regulations would reduce pollutant discharges by 470 million to 2.62 billion pounds annually and reduce water use by 50 billion to 103 billion gallons per year.

EPA also announced its intention to align this Clean Water Act rule with a related rule for coal combustion residuals (CCRs, also known as “coal ash”) proposed in 2010 under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The two rules would apply to many of the same facilities and would work together to reduce pollution associated with coal ash and related wastes. EPA is seeking comment from industry and other stakeholders to ensure that both final rules are aligned to reduce pollution efficiently and minimize regulatory burdens.

There are approximately 1,200 steam electric power plants that generate electricity using nuclear fuel or fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas in the U.S. Approximately 500 of these power plants are coal fired units which are the primary source of the pollutants being addressed by the proposed regulation. Power plants that are smaller than 50 megawatts would not be impacted by these new standards, and the majority of coal-fired power plants would incur no costs under the proposed standards.

The public comment period on the proposed rule will be open for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. The agency is under a consent decree to take final action by May 22, 2014.

More information: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/steam-electric/index.cfm



Boiler Area Source MACT Rule not stayed (CIBO commentary)

Tuesday, May 15th, 2012

An excerpt from Council of Industrial Boiler Owners (CIBO) newsletter dated May 10th, 2012:

The Stay – We were very disappointed in the Administration’s decision not to issue a Stay of the Area Source MACT Rule. Any Area Source boiler that has not had their boiler tuned is currently in violation of the law.

While EPA says it will turn their head until the new rule is issued, that does not preclude any environmental group from acting if the opportunity presents itself, or if they don’t particularly like something you are or are not doing. Only a Stay would provide that Safe Harbor.

EPA Announces Settlement With Marathon Petroleum Company

Thursday, April 5th, 2012

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Justice today announced an innovative environmental agreement with Ohio-based Marathon Petroleum Company that already has significantly reduced air pollution from all six of the company’s petroleum refineries. Marathon has agreed to state-of-the-art controls on flares and to a cap on the volume of waste gas it will send to its flares which is expected to reduce harmful air pollution by approximately 5,400 tons per year.

As part of the effort to reach this agreement, Marathon, under the direction and oversight of EPA, spent more than $2.4 million to develop and conduct pioneering combustion efficiency testing of flares and to advance the understanding of the relationship between flare operating parameters and flare combustion efficiency.

From 2008 to the end of 2011, the controls Marathon installed, such as flow monitors and gas chromatographs, have eliminated approximately 4720 tons per year of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 110 tons per year of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from the air. An additional 530 tons per year of VOCs and 30 tons per year of HAPs are projected to be eliminated in the future.

Marathon, headquartered in Findlay, Ohio, will pay a civil penalty of $460,000 to the United States.

For more about the settlement visit:
http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/caa/marathonrefining.html

Requirements published by EPA for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems (COMS) at Stationary Sources

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

The EPA published a direct final rule titled “Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources” in the Federal Register on February 14, 2012. Because the EPA received adverse comments to the parallel proposed rule issued under the same name on February 14, 2012, the EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule.

DATES: As of March 28, 2012, the EPA withdraws the direct final rule published on February 14, 2012 (77 FR 8160).

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-28/pdf/2012-7487.pdf

Agency Information Collection Activities for NESHAP for Natural Gas Transmission and Storage

Wednesday, March 14th, 2012

The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Natural Gas Transmission and Storage (40 CFR part 63, subpart HHH) were proposed on February 6, 1998, and promulgated on June 17, 1999. These regulations apply to existing facilities and new facilities that are major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) and that either transport or store natural gas prior to entering the pipeline to a local distribution company or to a final end user (if there is no local distribution company).

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-13/pdf/2012-6015.pdf

Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources

Wednesday, March 14th, 2012

The EPA is extending the comment period for the proposed rule titled, “Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources” that was published in the Federal Register on February 14, 2012. The proposed rule accompanied the direct final rule that was also published on February 14, 2012. The 30-day comment period in the proposed rule is scheduled to end on March 15, 2012. The extended comment period will close on April 30, 2012. The EPA is extending the comment period because of a request we received in a timely manner.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published February 14, 2012 (77 FR 8209), is extended. Comments must be received on or before April 30, 2012.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-08/html/2012-5642.htm

EPA proposing to approve revisions of San Joaquin Valley Air District Rules 2020 and 2201

Tuesday, December 6th, 2011

EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the California Air Resources Board. These revisions concern pre-construction review of new and modified stationary sources (‘‘new source review’’ or NSR) within the District. The revisions are intended to remedy deficiencies we identified when granting limited approval and limited disapproval to the rules in 2010, and to add NSR requirements for new major sources of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and major modifications at existing major PM2.5 sources as required by the Clean Air Act. We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

DATES: Any comments must arrive by January 5, 2012.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-12-06/pdf/2011-31183.pdf

Also, the EPA made an interim final determination to defer imposition of sanctions based on a proposed approval of revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD or District) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) published elsewhere in today’s Federal Register. The revisions concern SJVUAPCD Rules 2020 and 2201.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-12-06/pdf/2011-31184.pdf

CARB notified EPA of amended standards, certifications & test procedures for large spark-ignition non road engines.

Monday, October 31st, 2011
California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards;
Large Spark-Ignition (LSI) Engines;
Fleet Requirements for In-Use LSI Forklifts and Other Industrial Equipment;
Opportunity for Public Hearing and Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has notified EPA that it has
amended its emission standards and certification and test procedures for large
spark-ignition nonroad engines (``LSI Emission Standards''). CARB has also
adopted in-use fleet average emission requirements for large- and medium-sized
fleets (``LSI In-Use Fleet Requirements). California's LSI In-Use Fleet Require-
ments are applicable to fleets comprised of four or more pieces of equipment
powered by LSI engines, including forklifts, industrial tow tractors,
sweepers/scrubbers, and airport ground support equipment. CARB requests that EPA
find the amended LSI Emission Standards to be within the scope of a previously
granted LSI authorization or, in the alternative, grant a new full authorization
pursuant to Clean Air Act section 209(e). This notice announces that EPA has tent-
atively scheduled a public hearing to consider California's LSI Emission Standards
and LSI In-Use Fleet Requirements, and that EPA is now accepting written comment
on the request.

DATES: EPA has tentatively scheduled a public hearing concerning CARB's request on
November 15, 2011, at 10 a.m. ET. EPA will hold a hearing only if any party
notifies EPA by November 7, 2011, expressing interest in presenting the agency with
oral testimony.