Posts Tagged ‘Major source’

BOILER MACT Adjustments from 12/2011 reconsideration proposal

Wednesday, December 26th, 2012

EPA’s Air Rules for Major and Area Source Boilers and Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators
_______________________________________________________________________________________
This fact sheet summarizes the key comments received and the adjustments from the December 2011 proposal.

COMMENTS SUBMITTED ON PROPOSALS
Substantive comments were received on the proposals, including new data. Comments focused on a number of key topics.

• Boiler Major Source Rule:
o Achievability of carbon monoxide (CO) limits
o Justification for a solid fuel subcategory for mercury and hydrogen chloride (HCl)
o Establishment of a single PM emission limit for the solid fossil fuel subcategory
o Ability of certain gases to qualify as Gas 1 fuel (i.e., as clean as natural gas)
o Extending the compliance date
o Allowing averaging between subcategories for units that use natural gas

• Boiler Area Source Rule:
o Extension of the initial compliance date for existing boilers subject to tune-up requirements
o Reduced frequency of tune-ups for certain boilers
o Applicability based on definitions of “seasonal boiler,” “temporary boiler,” and “residential boiler”

• CISWI Rule:
o Further subcategorization of the solid-fuel Energy Recovery Unit (ERU) subcategory
o Proposed definition of “homogeneous waste”
o Definition of “contained gaseous material”
o Use of uncorrected CO Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) data during periods of startup and shutdown

• NHSM Rule:
o Revised definitions of “clean cellulosic biomass,” “contaminants,” and “established tire collection program”
o Concepts of “grouping” of contaminants and “design to burn” within the contaminant legitimacy 2 criterion
o Expansion of categorical list of non-waste fuels

KEY ADJUSTMENTS FROM RECONSIDERATION PROPOSAL TO FINAL

Based on additional data received, EPA made adjustments to several emission limits for major source boilers and CISWI units. Other changes are mainly editorial, to clarify applicability and implementation issues raised by the commenters.

• Boiler Major Source Rule
o Adding a separate subcategory for fluidized bed units with fluidized bed heat exchangers designed to burn coal
o Adjusting the definition of the limited use subcategory, allowing more flexibility on unit operations without increasing emissions or harm to human health and the environment.
o Adding performance test procedures for conducting performance stack test for demonstrating compliance with the alternate TSM emission limits.
o Establishing one single PM limit for all coal/solid fossil fuel subcategories.
o Allowing alternative total TSM emission limits for three liquid fuel subcategories, increasing the flexibility of the final rule.
o Adjusting some emission limits due to new data, corrections to old data and inventory changes.
o Reducing frequency of required tune-ups for some units, including units with continuous oxygen and CO trim systems.
o Revising definitions, including those for “30-day rolling average” and “daily block average,” “energy assessment” and “qualified energy assessor,” and “startup” and “shutdown.”
o Revising the sampling frequency for gaseous fuel-fired units that elected to demonstrate that the unit meets the specification for mercury for the unit designed to burn gas 1 subcategory.
o Extending the compliance time for demonstrating compliance with the numeric emission limits and energy assessment requirement to three years from the effective date of the amended rule, to provide facilities sufficient time to install controls or to make other compliance-related decisions. Existing boilers may request an additional year beyond that if technology cannot be installed in time.

• Boiler Area Source Rule
o Extending the initial compliance date for existing boilers subject to tune-up requirements to March
21, 2014.
o Revising the deadline for initial notification for existing boilers to no later than January 20, 2014.
o Dual-fuel fired boilers: revising provisions for existing dual-fuel fired units that fuel switch from gas
to coal, biomass or oil such that they would still be considered existing sources.
o Temporary boilers: amending the definition to allow petitioning for an extension beyond 12 months
for qualifying as a temporary boiler.
o Seasonal boilers: revising the definition of seasonal boiler to allow for 15 days of use during the
shutdown period for periodic testing and to clarify that the shutdown must be for a period of at
least 7 consecutive months each 12-month period.
o Limited-use boilers: adding a subcategory for boilers that have a federally enforceable average
annual capacity factor of no more than 10 percent and requiring these units to conduct tune-ups
every five years.
o Reducing frequency of tune-ups for boilers with an oxygen trim system that maintain an optimum
air-to-fuel ratio.
o Changing the energy assessment provisions and related definitions to better define the scope of the
assessment and allow for more streamlined assessments, including allowing sources already
operating under certain energy management programs to satisfy the assessment requirement.
o Revising PM emission limit requirements such that combustion of oil meeting certain sulfur content requirements by new oil-fired boilers is considered an alternative method of meeting the PM emission standard and that such units are not required to meet the PM emission limit.
o Reducing the fuel sampling and performance testing requirements such that after demonstration of initial compliance, under certain circumstances, further fuel sampling for boilers subject to a Hg emission limit and further PM performance testing for boilers subject to a PM emission limit is not required.

o Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) Rule
o Revising emission limits, include small remote incinerators (SRI), incinerators, energy recovery units (ERU) and waste burning kilns subcategories resulting from additional data, updated unit inventories, and methodology adjustments.
o Establishing separate emission standards for all nine pollutants from coal and biomass energy recovery units (ERUs).
o Expanding authorization to use uncorrected continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) data during periods of startup and shutdown to all pollutants for which a source demonstrates compliance with CEMS.
o Clarifying the methodology for establishing and monitoring oxygen levels.
o Removing the definition of homogeneous waste and retaining the requirement that certain facilities that combust solid waste obtain a determination from the EPA that such waste is homogenous.
o Requiring continuous parameter monitoring systems, instead of PM CEMS, for waste-burning kilns and large ERUs.
o Extending the effective dates for all CISWI, including small remote incinerators, to provide facilities sufficient time to install controls or to make other compliance-related decisions. Existing units will need to comply no later than three years after EPA approves a state plan or five years after the publication date of these final changes, whichever is earlier.
o Correcting the definition of waste-burning kiln and clarifying that the threshold for determining if a unit is subject to the CISWI rule is whether it “combusts” solid waste material.

o NHSM Rule
o Revising contaminant legitimacy criterion for NHSMs used as fuels, to make clear flexibility in how contaminant comparisons between NHSMs and traditional fuels may be made.
o Adding “dewatered pulp and paper sludges burned on-site at facilities that use a significant portion of materials as fuels where such dewatered sludges are managed in a manner that preserves the meaningful heating value of the materials” to the list of categorical non-waste fuels.
o Adding “coal refuse that has been recovered from legacy piles and processed in the same manner as currently-generated coal refuse” to the list of categorical non-waste fuels.
o Finalizing new rulemaking petition process for other categorical non-waste determinations.
o Streamlining existing petition process for NHSMs transferred off-site.

Revised Boiler MACT and Incinerator MACT rules out for public comment (Major source, Area source, CISWI)

Friday, December 2nd, 2011

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing changes to Clean Air Act standards for boilers and certain incinerators based on extensive analysis, review and consideration of data and input from states, environmental groups, industry, lawmakers and the public. The proposed reconsideration would achieve extensive public health protections through significant reductions in toxic air pollutants, including mercury and soot, while increasing the rule’s flexibility and addressing compliance concerns raised by industry and labor groups. The changes also cut the cost of implementation by nearly 50 percent from the original 2010 proposed rule while maintaining health benefits. These standards meet important requirements laid out in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.

“With this action, EPA is applying the right standards to the right boilers,” said Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation. “Gathering the latest and best real-world information is leading to practical, affordable air pollution safeguards that will provide the vital and overdue health protection that Americans deserve.”

More than 99 percent of boilers in the country are either clean enough that they are not covered by these standards or will only need to conduct maintenance and tune-ups to comply. Today’s proposals focus on the less than one percent of boilers that emit the majority of pollution from this sector. For these high emitting boilers, typically operating at refineries, chemical plants and other industrial facilities, EPA is proposing more targeted emissions limits that protect Americans’ health and provide industry with practical, cost-effective options to meet the standards – informed by data from these stakeholders. These limits are based on currently available technologies that are in use by sources across the country.

As a result of further information gathered through the reconsideration process, including significant dialog and meetings with stakeholders, the proposal maintains the dramatic cuts in the cost of implementation that were achieved in the final rules issued in March while continuing to deliver significant public health benefits. As a result, EPA estimates that for every dollar spent to cut these pollutants, the public will see $12 to $30 in health benefits, including fewer premature deaths.

Using a wide variety of fuels, including coal, natural gas, oil and biomass, boilers are used to power heavy machinery, provide heat for industrial and manufacturing processes in addition to a number of other uses, or heat large buildings. EPA’s proposal recognizes the diverse and complex range of uses and fuels and tailors standards to reflect the real-world operating conditions of specific types of boilers.

Some of the key changes EPA is proposing include:

Boilers at large sources of air toxics emissions: The major source proposal covers approximately 14,000 boilers – less than one percent of all boilers in the United States – located at large sources of air pollutants, including refineries, chemical plants, and other industrial facilities. EPA is proposing to create additional subcategories and revise emissions limits. EPA is also proposing to provide more flexible compliance options for meeting the particle pollution and carbon monoxide limits, replace numeric emissions limits with work practice standards for certain pollutants, allow more flexibility for units burning clean gases to qualify for work practice standards and reduce some monitoring requirements. EPA estimates that the cost of implementing these standards remains about $1.5 billion less than the April 2010 proposed standards. Health benefits to children and the public associated with reduced exposure to fine particles and ozone from these large source boilers have increased by almost 25 percent and are estimated to be $27 billion to $67 billion in 2015.

Boilers located at small sources of air toxics emissions: The proposal also covers about 187,000 boilers located at small sources of air pollutants, including commercial buildings, universities, hospitals and hotels. However, due to how little these boilers emit, 98 percent of area source boilers would simply be required to perform maintenance and routine tune-ups to comply with these standards. Only 2 percent of area source boilers may need to take additional steps to comply with the rule. To increase flexibility for most of these sources, EPA is proposing to require initial compliance tune-ups after two years instead after the first year.

Solid waste incinerators and revisions to the list of non-hazardous secondary materials: There are 95 solid waste incinerators that burn waste at a commercial or an industrial facility, including cement manufacturing facilities. EPA is proposing to adjust emissions limits for waste-burning cement kilns and for energy recovery units.

EPA is also proposing revisions to its final rule which identified the types of non-hazardous secondary materials that can be burned in boilers or solid waste incinerators. Following the release of that final rule, stakeholders expressed concerns regarding the regulatory criteria for a non-hazardous secondary material to be considered a legitimate, non-waste fuel, and how to demonstrate compliance with those criteria. To address these concerns, EPA’s proposed revisions provide clarity on what types of secondary materials are considered non-waste fuels, and greater flexibility. The proposed revisions also classify a number of secondary materials as non-wastes when used as a fuel and allow for a boiler or solid waste operator to request that EPA identify specific materials as a non-waste fuel.

Following the April 2010 proposals, the agency received more than 4,800 comments from businesses, communities and other key stakeholders. As part of the reconsideration process, EPA also received additional feedback after the agency issued the final standards in March 2011. EPA will accept public comment on these standards for 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. EPA intends to finalize the reconsideration by spring 2012.

More information: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/combustion

Boiler MACT/NESHAP Major & Area Source Boiler (ICI) plus NSPS Solid Waste and Sewage Sludge Incineration (CISWI & SSI) Final Rules Published in Federal Register

Monday, March 21st, 2011

NESHAP:  Major Source Boiler/Boiler MACT/”ICI”:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-03-21/html/2011-4494.htm

NESHAP:  Area Source Boiler/Boiler GACT/”ICI”:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-03-21/html/2011-4493.htm

NSPS: Solid Waste Incineration/”CISWI”:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-03-21/html/2011-4495.htm

NSPS: Sewage Sludge Incineration/”SSI”:  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-03-21/html/2011-4491.htm

EPA files motion seeking 15 month extension of Boiler MACT/CISWI Rules.

Thursday, December 9th, 2010

December 7th, 2010, the EPA filed a motion in the federal court seeking an extension in the current court-ordered schedule for issuing new Boiler MACT/CISWI rules.  EPA estimates that under the proposed major source boiler rule, 13,555 boilers and process heaters located at 1,600 facilities will be impacted.  Under the proposed area source boiler rule, EPA estimates 183,000 boilers and 92,000 facilities.  Both the health impacts and costs of these rules are estimated in the billions or 10’s of billions.  EPA estimate 176 solid waste units. 

The motion requests an extension from January 16th, 2011 to April 13, 2012 to re-propose and finalize these standards. 

EPA stated that the additional time will allow it to respond to the issues raised in the thousands of public comments on the reproposed/proposed rules, gain additional public comments and information, and re-propose a rule that will be protective and legally defensible, and result in standards that are more defensable and yield benefits earlier.    

You can read the motion filed here.

MACT/NESHAPs: Plating/Chromium, Polymers/Resins, Marine Tanks, Pharmaceuticals, Printing/Publishing, Steel Pickling–HCl Process Rules Revised or Proposed

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions:

  1. Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks
  2. Group I Polymers and Resins
  3. Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations
  4. Pharmaceuticals Production
  5. The Printing and Publishing Industry
  6. Steel Pickling–HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants

SUMMARY: This action proposes how EPA will address the residual risk and technology reviews conducted for two national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP), and this action is a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking for an October 2008 action that proposed how EPA would address the residual risk and technology reviews for four NESHAP. The six NESHAP include 16 source categories, 12 of which are the subject of residual risk and technology reviews in this package. This action proposes to modify the existing emissions standards for eight source categories in three of the six NESHAP to address certain emission sources not currently regulated under these standards. It also proposes for all six NESHAP to address provisions related to emissions during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. Finally, this action proposes changes to two of the six NESHAP to correct editorial errors, make clarifications, or address issues with implementation or determining compliance.

Proposed Boiler/CISWI MACT: EPA is extending the deadline for written comments and having public hearings on rules (major source boilers, area source boilers, CISWI) and the definition of solid waste.

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

SUMMARY: On April 29, 2010, the EPA Administrator signed proposed emission standards for the following source categories: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters located at major sources; Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers located at area sources; and Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units. On the same date, the Administrator also signed a proposal entitled “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste.” EPA has received a request to schedule additional public hearings for these four related rulemakings. Given the significant public interest in these rules and to further public participation opportunities, EPA is granting the request and has scheduled three public hearings. These hearings will occur in Arlington, Virginia, on June 15, 2010; Houston, Texas, on June 22, 2010; and Los Angeles, California, on June 22, 2010. More information on the locations is shown in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    In addition, EPA is extending the deadline for written comments on the proposed rules (75 FR 32006 (major source boilers), 75 FR 31896 (area source boilers), 75 FR 31938 (CISWI), and 75 FR 31844 (waste definition)) to August 3, 2010. This extension will provide additional time for public participation.

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-13877.htm

Boiler Combustion MACT – Major source, Area source & CISWI website link

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Emissions Standards for Boilers and Process Heaters and Commercial / Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators

http://www.epa.gov/airquality/combustion/actions.html